The rest of chapter 24 talks about the global environment. There has been lots of change. Population increase was a big deal and I was shocked to see how much it grew. Global warming became an issue in 2000. 30% of global warming is from the United Sates. Good things lots of people and organizations work to save the environment now. Back then people didn't care and everything was dieing.
Sims
Wednesday, April 18, 2012
Saturday, April 14, 2012
Women Issues in Presidential Race
Amy Gehrt: Women to play prominent role in presidential election
Read more: Amy Gehrt: Women to play prominent role in presidential election - Woburn, MA - Woburn Advocate http://www.wickedlocal.com/woburn/archive/x1170667167/Amy-Gehrt-Women-to-play-prominent-role-in-presidential-election#ixzz1s3XkGxIB
The protracted Republican presidential primary race is wrapping up, leaving Mitt Romney poised to claim victory. But even with a win all but assured, that doesn’t mean it is smooth sailing for the presumptive nominee.Read more: Amy Gehrt: Women to play prominent role in presidential election - Woburn, MA - Woburn Advocate http://www.wickedlocal.com/woburn/archive/x1170667167/Amy-Gehrt-Women-to-play-prominent-role-in-presidential-election#ixzz1s3XkGxIB
Instead, the former Massachusetts governor will have a much bigger battle on his hands this fall. And in this fight, President Barack Obama is the one with the advantage.
According to a recent USA Today/Gallup poll conducted in 12 swing states — Colorado, Florida, Iowa, Michigan, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Mexico, North Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Virginia and Wisconsin — Obama boasts a 51-42 lead over Romney in the general election.
While that may not seem insurmountable in and of itself, when one takes a closer look at the breakdown of those voters the difficulty of closing that gap becomes more apparent.
That’s because one critical constituency is credited with providing the incumbent Democrat with such a commanding edge: women. Men are about evenly split between Obama and Romney, but women favor the president by 18 percentage points. Those numbers are even more telling when examined alongside polling data taken in mid-February, when just under half of women under 50 supported Obama.
Of course that uptick in support for Obama is hardly surprising, given that the Republican Party began waging a war on women in recent months. It does, however, mean women’s issues will play a prominent role in the presidential campaign season.
And that could spell trouble for Romney, who has made a series of missteps when it comes to weighing in on issues such as birth control, Planned Parenthood and abortion. In fact, his inconsistent comments have caused such a stir in the past that any time a question related to a women’s issue arises on the campaign trail he appears incapable of even expressing his own viewpoint, preferring to defer to his wife Ann.
For example, when asked during campaign stop in Middleton, Wis., last week about the contraceptives controversy Romney said, “I wish Ann were here ... to answer that question in particular.”
Obama, meanwhile, seems to have a much firmer grasp of the issues facing female voters. Friday, the president hosted a conference on women and the economy. He used the opportunity to highlight some of his administration’s accomplishments on women’s issues — including equal pay, health care reform, getting more girls into science and math classes and workplace flexibility.
But, he noted, the issues women care about most affect everyone. “When we talk about these issues that primarily impact women, we’ve got to realize they are not just women’s issues. They are family issues, they are economic issues, they are growth issues, they are issues about American competitiveness,” Obama said.
The protracted Republican presidential primary race is wrapping up, leaving Mitt Romney poised to claim victory. But even with a win all but assured, that doesn’t mean it is smooth sailing for the presumptive nominee.
Instead, the former Massachusetts governor will have a much bigger battle on his hands this fall. And in this fight, President Barack Obama is the one with the advantage.
According to a recent USA Today/Gallup poll conducted in 12 swing states — Colorado, Florida, Iowa, Michigan, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Mexico, North Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Virginia and Wisconsin — Obama boasts a 51-42 lead over Romney in the general election.
While that may not seem insurmountable in and of itself, when one takes a closer look at the breakdown of those voters the difficulty of closing that gap becomes more apparent.
That’s because one critical constituency is credited with providing the incumbent Democrat with such a commanding edge: women. Men are about evenly split between Obama and Romney, but women favor the president by 18 percentage points. Those numbers are even more telling when examined alongside polling data taken in mid-February, when just under half of women under 50 supported Obama.
Of course that uptick in support for Obama is hardly surprising, given that the Republican Party began waging a war on women in recent months. It does, however, mean women’s issues will play a prominent role in the presidential campaign season.
And that could spell trouble for Romney, who has made a series of missteps when it comes to weighing in on issues such as birth control, Planned Parenthood and abortion. In fact, his inconsistent comments have caused such a stir in the past that any time a question related to a women’s issue arises on the campaign trail he appears incapable of even expressing his own viewpoint, preferring to defer to his wife Ann.
For example, when asked during campaign stop in Middleton, Wis., last week about the contraceptives controversy Romney said, “I wish Ann were here ... to answer that question in particular.”
Obama, meanwhile, seems to have a much firmer grasp of the issues facing female voters. Friday, the president hosted a conference on women and the economy. He used the opportunity to highlight some of his administration’s accomplishments on women’s issues — including equal pay, health care reform, getting more girls into science and math classes and workplace flexibility.
But, he noted, the issues women care about most affect everyone. “When we talk about these issues that primarily impact women, we’ve got to realize they are not just women’s issues. They are family issues, they are economic issues, they are growth issues, they are issues about American competitiveness,” Obama said.
Romney, too, spoke of the importance of economic issues to women last week, but even then he once again cited his wife, telling the Newspaper Association of America, “She reports to me regularly that the issue women care about most is the economy, and getting good jobs for their kids and for themselves.”
Don’t get me wrong. I am all for consulting experts, and I firmly believe it is essential to have strong female voices speaking out on behalf of women. However, being the leader of the free world means one must be able to address issues facing all Americans — regardless of their gender, race, ethnicity or sexual orientation — equally.
If Romney can only form an opinion on an issue from within his own demographic, he has no business running for president of anything. But I guess his campaign staffers can always shake the Etch-A-Sketch and craft yet another new image for their not-so-fearless leader before November.
Amy Gehrt may be reached at agehrt@pekintimes.com. The views expressed in this column are not necessarily those of the newspaper.
Instead, the former Massachusetts governor will have a much bigger battle on his hands this fall. And in this fight, President Barack Obama is the one with the advantage.
According to a recent USA Today/Gallup poll conducted in 12 swing states — Colorado, Florida, Iowa, Michigan, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Mexico, North Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Virginia and Wisconsin — Obama boasts a 51-42 lead over Romney in the general election.
While that may not seem insurmountable in and of itself, when one takes a closer look at the breakdown of those voters the difficulty of closing that gap becomes more apparent.
That’s because one critical constituency is credited with providing the incumbent Democrat with such a commanding edge: women. Men are about evenly split between Obama and Romney, but women favor the president by 18 percentage points. Those numbers are even more telling when examined alongside polling data taken in mid-February, when just under half of women under 50 supported Obama.
Of course that uptick in support for Obama is hardly surprising, given that the Republican Party began waging a war on women in recent months. It does, however, mean women’s issues will play a prominent role in the presidential campaign season.
And that could spell trouble for Romney, who has made a series of missteps when it comes to weighing in on issues such as birth control, Planned Parenthood and abortion. In fact, his inconsistent comments have caused such a stir in the past that any time a question related to a women’s issue arises on the campaign trail he appears incapable of even expressing his own viewpoint, preferring to defer to his wife Ann.
For example, when asked during campaign stop in Middleton, Wis., last week about the contraceptives controversy Romney said, “I wish Ann were here ... to answer that question in particular.”
Obama, meanwhile, seems to have a much firmer grasp of the issues facing female voters. Friday, the president hosted a conference on women and the economy. He used the opportunity to highlight some of his administration’s accomplishments on women’s issues — including equal pay, health care reform, getting more girls into science and math classes and workplace flexibility.
But, he noted, the issues women care about most affect everyone. “When we talk about these issues that primarily impact women, we’ve got to realize they are not just women’s issues. They are family issues, they are economic issues, they are growth issues, they are issues about American competitiveness,” Obama said.
Romney, too, spoke of the importance of economic issues to women last week, but even then he once again cited his wife, telling the Newspaper Association of America, “She reports to me regularly that the issue women care about most is the economy, and getting good jobs for their kids and for themselves.”
Don’t get me wrong. I am all for consulting experts, and I firmly believe it is essential to have strong female voices speaking out on behalf of women. However, being the leader of the free world means one must be able to address issues facing all Americans — regardless of their gender, race, ethnicity or sexual orientation — equally.
If Romney can only form an opinion on an issue from within his own demographic, he has no business running for president of anything. But I guess his campaign staffers can always shake the Etch-A-Sketch and craft yet another new image for their not-so-fearless leader before November.
Amy Gehrt may be reached at agehrt@pekintimes.com. The views expressed in this column are not necessarily those of the newspaper.
Read more: Amy Gehrt: Women to play prominent role in presidential election - Woburn, MA - Woburn Advocate http://www.wickedlocal.com/woburn/archive/x1170667167/Amy-Gehrt-Women-to-play-prominent-role-in-presidential-election#ixzz1s3Xg3rVH
Chp 24 pg. 740-747
The rest of the chapter talked about the development in religion and society. People took things more seriously and started changing somethings they did. For example, woman wore dresses and veil. Fasting and praying became more important. People started praying everyday. I don't understand how people fast, I'm glad I'm not in a religon. I don't have to worry about those things!
Chp.24 pg. 734-739
This part of the chapter talks about lots of violence. Lots of children were lost and involved in things kids shouldn't be doing. Lots of the kids were prostituting and in gangs. These pages also talked about the feminist movement. This movement occured all over the world. Women have came a long way!!
Wednesday, April 11, 2012
Women of the Arab Spring Ms. Magazine
http://www.msmagazine.com/spring2011/womenofthearabspring.asp
The Middle East’s pro-democracy uprisings may well be the latest in a long line of gifts (algebra, soap, even the fork) that Arab civilizations have given the world. Yet one might think only men were risking, and sometimes losing, their lives in these protests—and definitely leading them.
But women were (and are) involved at every stage, including leadership. This doesn’t surprise those familiar with Arab feminism, since women have been the most consistent advocates of civil society across the region. In most of these countries women suffer from such discriminatory legislation as “guardianship laws,” which imprison them in the status of minors, so they’re well aware that “democracy” for half the people isn’t democracy. But they also have reason to be wary about how male-defined revolutions betray women.
Western instances of this abound, but a notorious Arab example is fitting. During the Algerian revolt against French colonialism, women fought and died beside men in the underground, certain that their own future equality was at stake. But with independence won, their “revolutionary brothers” sent them back to the kitchen.
So it’s crucial to document the vital role women play in these uprisings, and how they’re planning to ensure that in post-revolutionary and transitional periods they (and democracy) won’t be double-crossed again.
Each country’s situation is volatile and different, and Ms. will stay with the ongoing story. This report will focus on Tunisia and Egypt, the two “post-revolutionary” states as of this writing.
Tunisia, where the ferment began and the “Jasmine Revolution” toppled President Zine el Abidine Ben Ali, demolishes stereotypes. In the country’s (relatively) progressive, secular society, women have had access to contraception since 1962 and abortion since 1965—eight years before Roe v. Wade. After independence from France in 1956, the government abolished polygamy and legislated women’s equality in marriage, divorce and child custody. Later, a minimum marriage age of 18 was established, as were penalties for domestic violence. Still, daughters could inherit only half of what sons could, and a husband could hold property a wife acquired during marriage.
So Tunisian women, their democratic yearnings deepened by their feminist ones, were ready to rebel. Blogger Lina Ben Mhenni was probably first to alert the world to Tunisian protests, in December 2010. (Despite threats and censorship, she persists.) And women flocked to rallies— wearing veils, jeans and miniskirts— young girls, grandmothers, female judges in their court robes. They ousted a despot and inspired a region.
But building a new society is a different challenge. Feminist Raja bin Salama, a vocal critic of fundamentalist subjugation of women, called for Tunisia’s new laws to be based on the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. She was denounced by Rashid al-Ghannouchi, exiled head of the Islamist party Ennahda, who vowed to hang her in Tunis’ Basij Square. He has now returned to Tunisia.
Still, Khadija Cherif, former head of the Tunisian Association of Democratic Women, guarantees women will continue to defend separation of mosque and state, saying, “The force of the Tunisian feminist movement is that we’ve never separated it from the fight for democracy and a secular society.”
The revolution Tunisia pioneered, Egypt made a trend, and one facilitated by women. Despite decades of dictatorship, a long-established feminist movement has survived there. Women had been key to the 1919 revolution against the British, but after independence were ignored by the ruling Wafd Party. The feminist movement erupted in 1923 when Huda Sha’rawi publicly stripped off her veil.
Remaining as active as possible in an autocracy, the movement embraces many NGOs and activists, reflected in the women at Tahrir Square who represented “all generations and social classes,” according to Amal Abdel Hady of the New Woman Foundation. At Tahrir Square’s checkpoints, men frisked men; women, women; and while there were several men’s lines to each one for women, that’s because in the past men—protesters as well as police— sexually harassed women so severely during protests that few women demonstrated. But Hady also noticed that the media paid much less attention to the women, fostering a perception that only men were in charge.
Yet, the action had been precipitated by a 26-year-old woman whom Egyptians now call “Leader of the Revolution.” On January 18, Asmaa Mahfouz uploaded a short video to YouTube and Facebook in which she announced, “Whoever says women shouldn’t go to protests because they will get beaten, let him have some honor and manhood and come with me on January 25.” The video went viral. The planned one-day demonstration became a popular revolution.
Soon, unsung protest coordinator Amal Sharaf—a 36-year-old English teacher, single mother and member of the organizers’ April 6 Youth Movement—was spending days and nights in the movement’s tiny office, smoking furiously and overseeing a crew of men. Google employee Wael Ghonim, who privately administered one of the Facebook pages that were the movement’s virtual headquarters, would later become an icon—but after he was arrested, young Nadine Wahab, an Egyptian American expert on new-media advocacy, took over, strengthening the online presence.
While Women of Egypt, a Facebook group, assembled a photo gallery of women’s role in the protests, neighborhood women wielding clubs patrolled their streets for security once the police vanished. “We see women, Islamist or not Islamist, veiled or not veiled, coming together and leading what’s happening on the ground,” said Magda Adly of the El Nadim Center for the Rehabilitation of Victims of Violence to Inter Press Service. “We’ll never go back to square one.”
Nonetheless, Nawla Darwish of the New Woman Foundation fears that because women weren’t pushing their own rights during the demonstrations, they’ll be ignored. “We are living in a patriarchal society,” she told Al-Masry Al-Youm, an Egyptian newspaper. And even the January 25 revolution may not be enough to change that.
Such fears are being realized. Nehad Abou El Komsan, chair of the Egyptian Center for Women’s Rights, is indignant that women have been left out of the political dialogue since Mubarak was ousted. Deplorably, the committee to redraft the constitution excluded women, even female legal experts. The Egyptian Center for Women’s Rights issued a statement denouncing the exclusion, signed to date by 102 Egyptian women’s organizations. So far, no response.
Egypt’s leading feminist, Nawal El Saadawi, now 80, feels a new social compact emerged in Tahrir Square: “But how to sustain this? We learned from Algeria. Women became angry when we heard the constitutional committee had not a single woman. Then the men dismissed our statement, since it was only paper. So we began planning a march and we are reestablishing the Egyptian Women’s Union—which had been banned—as an umbrella organization. We must unite for political power or men will exclude us. Once we are in the streets in millions, it’s not paper.”
Meanwhile, women persevere with stunning courage across the region.
In Yemen, protests were sparked by the arrest of 32-year-old Tawakul Karman, head of Women Journalists Without Chains. Now released, she insists, “There is no solution [to extremism] other than spreading the culture of coexistence and dialogue, skills that women master and possess.” In Bahrain, when police fired teargas at Shia women in chadors chanting anti-government slogans, the women sat down, and only after the police fled the caustic fumes did they leave. In Algeria, feminists marched, chanting, “Away with the family code!” In Gaza, Palestinians rallied, demanding that Hamas and Fatah unite, while Asma al-Ghoul, a young journalist known for her defiant feminism, called for a secular Palestine. In Libya, the revolt is, at this writing, still convulsively violent, including little-noticed reports of mass rape by government-hired mercenaries. Even less known is that it all began at the Benghazi attorney general’s office with a sit-in by lawyers and judges—led by Salwa Bugaighis, a lawyer in her mid-40s.
As Ms. goes to press, protests still are igniting in Jordan, Morocco, Libya, Oman, Sudan, Iraq, Lebanon and Djibouti. International Women’s Day demonstrations were staged in Kuwait, Bahrain, Yemen and Egypt. Rallies are even being planned in Saudi Arabia. In Iran—which is Persian, not Arab— thousands took to the streets against the theocracy. A regional young feminist action alliance, Women United for the Future of the Middle East, has just formed.
These women, who must confront first tyrants and then comrades, refuse to be stopped.
One last example. Syria, tightly controlling of its populace, boasts of setting records for women’s advancement. Vice President Najah al-Attar is the first woman in the Arab world to hold such a position (however questionable her real power). Yet in February, Tal al-Molouhi, a 19-year-old high-school student, stood in court chained and blindfolded and was sentenced to five years imprisonment. She had blogged about longing for a role in building Syria’s future.
Tal is that future. Sixty percent of the population in these countries is under age 30—and more than half is female.
The Middle East’s pro-democracy uprisings may well be the latest in a long line of gifts (algebra, soap, even the fork) that Arab civilizations have given the world. Yet one might think only men were risking, and sometimes losing, their lives in these protests—and definitely leading them.
But women were (and are) involved at every stage, including leadership. This doesn’t surprise those familiar with Arab feminism, since women have been the most consistent advocates of civil society across the region. In most of these countries women suffer from such discriminatory legislation as “guardianship laws,” which imprison them in the status of minors, so they’re well aware that “democracy” for half the people isn’t democracy. But they also have reason to be wary about how male-defined revolutions betray women.
Western instances of this abound, but a notorious Arab example is fitting. During the Algerian revolt against French colonialism, women fought and died beside men in the underground, certain that their own future equality was at stake. But with independence won, their “revolutionary brothers” sent them back to the kitchen.
So it’s crucial to document the vital role women play in these uprisings, and how they’re planning to ensure that in post-revolutionary and transitional periods they (and democracy) won’t be double-crossed again.
Each country’s situation is volatile and different, and Ms. will stay with the ongoing story. This report will focus on Tunisia and Egypt, the two “post-revolutionary” states as of this writing.
Tunisia, where the ferment began and the “Jasmine Revolution” toppled President Zine el Abidine Ben Ali, demolishes stereotypes. In the country’s (relatively) progressive, secular society, women have had access to contraception since 1962 and abortion since 1965—eight years before Roe v. Wade. After independence from France in 1956, the government abolished polygamy and legislated women’s equality in marriage, divorce and child custody. Later, a minimum marriage age of 18 was established, as were penalties for domestic violence. Still, daughters could inherit only half of what sons could, and a husband could hold property a wife acquired during marriage.
So Tunisian women, their democratic yearnings deepened by their feminist ones, were ready to rebel. Blogger Lina Ben Mhenni was probably first to alert the world to Tunisian protests, in December 2010. (Despite threats and censorship, she persists.) And women flocked to rallies— wearing veils, jeans and miniskirts— young girls, grandmothers, female judges in their court robes. They ousted a despot and inspired a region.
But building a new society is a different challenge. Feminist Raja bin Salama, a vocal critic of fundamentalist subjugation of women, called for Tunisia’s new laws to be based on the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. She was denounced by Rashid al-Ghannouchi, exiled head of the Islamist party Ennahda, who vowed to hang her in Tunis’ Basij Square. He has now returned to Tunisia.
Still, Khadija Cherif, former head of the Tunisian Association of Democratic Women, guarantees women will continue to defend separation of mosque and state, saying, “The force of the Tunisian feminist movement is that we’ve never separated it from the fight for democracy and a secular society.”
The revolution Tunisia pioneered, Egypt made a trend, and one facilitated by women. Despite decades of dictatorship, a long-established feminist movement has survived there. Women had been key to the 1919 revolution against the British, but after independence were ignored by the ruling Wafd Party. The feminist movement erupted in 1923 when Huda Sha’rawi publicly stripped off her veil.
Remaining as active as possible in an autocracy, the movement embraces many NGOs and activists, reflected in the women at Tahrir Square who represented “all generations and social classes,” according to Amal Abdel Hady of the New Woman Foundation. At Tahrir Square’s checkpoints, men frisked men; women, women; and while there were several men’s lines to each one for women, that’s because in the past men—protesters as well as police— sexually harassed women so severely during protests that few women demonstrated. But Hady also noticed that the media paid much less attention to the women, fostering a perception that only men were in charge.
Yet, the action had been precipitated by a 26-year-old woman whom Egyptians now call “Leader of the Revolution.” On January 18, Asmaa Mahfouz uploaded a short video to YouTube and Facebook in which she announced, “Whoever says women shouldn’t go to protests because they will get beaten, let him have some honor and manhood and come with me on January 25.” The video went viral. The planned one-day demonstration became a popular revolution.
Soon, unsung protest coordinator Amal Sharaf—a 36-year-old English teacher, single mother and member of the organizers’ April 6 Youth Movement—was spending days and nights in the movement’s tiny office, smoking furiously and overseeing a crew of men. Google employee Wael Ghonim, who privately administered one of the Facebook pages that were the movement’s virtual headquarters, would later become an icon—but after he was arrested, young Nadine Wahab, an Egyptian American expert on new-media advocacy, took over, strengthening the online presence.
While Women of Egypt, a Facebook group, assembled a photo gallery of women’s role in the protests, neighborhood women wielding clubs patrolled their streets for security once the police vanished. “We see women, Islamist or not Islamist, veiled or not veiled, coming together and leading what’s happening on the ground,” said Magda Adly of the El Nadim Center for the Rehabilitation of Victims of Violence to Inter Press Service. “We’ll never go back to square one.”
Nonetheless, Nawla Darwish of the New Woman Foundation fears that because women weren’t pushing their own rights during the demonstrations, they’ll be ignored. “We are living in a patriarchal society,” she told Al-Masry Al-Youm, an Egyptian newspaper. And even the January 25 revolution may not be enough to change that.
Such fears are being realized. Nehad Abou El Komsan, chair of the Egyptian Center for Women’s Rights, is indignant that women have been left out of the political dialogue since Mubarak was ousted. Deplorably, the committee to redraft the constitution excluded women, even female legal experts. The Egyptian Center for Women’s Rights issued a statement denouncing the exclusion, signed to date by 102 Egyptian women’s organizations. So far, no response.
Egypt’s leading feminist, Nawal El Saadawi, now 80, feels a new social compact emerged in Tahrir Square: “But how to sustain this? We learned from Algeria. Women became angry when we heard the constitutional committee had not a single woman. Then the men dismissed our statement, since it was only paper. So we began planning a march and we are reestablishing the Egyptian Women’s Union—which had been banned—as an umbrella organization. We must unite for political power or men will exclude us. Once we are in the streets in millions, it’s not paper.”
Meanwhile, women persevere with stunning courage across the region.
In Yemen, protests were sparked by the arrest of 32-year-old Tawakul Karman, head of Women Journalists Without Chains. Now released, she insists, “There is no solution [to extremism] other than spreading the culture of coexistence and dialogue, skills that women master and possess.” In Bahrain, when police fired teargas at Shia women in chadors chanting anti-government slogans, the women sat down, and only after the police fled the caustic fumes did they leave. In Algeria, feminists marched, chanting, “Away with the family code!” In Gaza, Palestinians rallied, demanding that Hamas and Fatah unite, while Asma al-Ghoul, a young journalist known for her defiant feminism, called for a secular Palestine. In Libya, the revolt is, at this writing, still convulsively violent, including little-noticed reports of mass rape by government-hired mercenaries. Even less known is that it all began at the Benghazi attorney general’s office with a sit-in by lawyers and judges—led by Salwa Bugaighis, a lawyer in her mid-40s.
As Ms. goes to press, protests still are igniting in Jordan, Morocco, Libya, Oman, Sudan, Iraq, Lebanon and Djibouti. International Women’s Day demonstrations were staged in Kuwait, Bahrain, Yemen and Egypt. Rallies are even being planned in Saudi Arabia. In Iran—which is Persian, not Arab— thousands took to the streets against the theocracy. A regional young feminist action alliance, Women United for the Future of the Middle East, has just formed.
These women, who must confront first tyrants and then comrades, refuse to be stopped.
One last example. Syria, tightly controlling of its populace, boasts of setting records for women’s advancement. Vice President Najah al-Attar is the first woman in the Arab world to hold such a position (however questionable her real power). Yet in February, Tal al-Molouhi, a 19-year-old high-school student, stood in court chained and blindfolded and was sentenced to five years imprisonment. She had blogged about longing for a role in building Syria’s future.
Tal is that future. Sixty percent of the population in these countries is under age 30—and more than half is female.
Chp. 24 pg.723-734
Chapter 24 talks about gloablization. The world started having political relationships and cultural influences in the 20th century. Everything changed after world war two. Barbie and Ken were popular and both made in China. I didn't even know that!
-Sims
-Sims
Tuesday, April 3, 2012
Martin Luther King and Gandhi Quotes
Ghandi
“Be the change you want to see in the world.”
“Live as if you were to die tomorrow. Learn as if you were to live forever.”
Martin Luther King
"At the center of non-violence stands the principle of love."
"I have decided to stick with love. Hate is too great a burden to bear."
These quotes are the best ones I could find. Gandhi and Martin Luther King were both peace makers. They both wanted to improve the society and help people do better in life. Love and Peace is the better way to go because violence doesn't help anything. They were both powerful positive role models.
-Sims
“Be the change you want to see in the world.”
“Live as if you were to die tomorrow. Learn as if you were to live forever.”
Martin Luther King
"At the center of non-violence stands the principle of love."
"I have decided to stick with love. Hate is too great a burden to bear."
These quotes are the best ones I could find. Gandhi and Martin Luther King were both peace makers. They both wanted to improve the society and help people do better in life. Love and Peace is the better way to go because violence doesn't help anything. They were both powerful positive role models.
-Sims
Chp. 23 Global South
Nelson Mandela became president of South African after doing 27 years in prison. Ghandi wanted freedom and lots of countries gained freedom. This reading was boring.
-Sims
-Sims
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)